|
Sandip Roy
Sandip Roy is an editor with New America Media and host of its radio show New America Now on KALW 91.7 FM.
“Where was this woman during her interview with Katie Couric?” asks David Brooks in his New York Times column today. Which woman? You know, the one that didn’t fall flat on her face. Sarah Palin did not fall flat on her face. And by that token she apparently succeeded in the Vice presidential debate. This is the first presidential election I will vote in. And I find it very scary that “not falling flat on your face” is regarded as an acceptable passing grade for vice president. “Even if expectations hadn’t been in the basement Sarah Palin did quite well last night” writes Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post In Debate, G.O.P. Ticket Survives a Test was the headline for the New York Times Women on Palin: Even critics say she delivers headlined MSNBC. What exactly did she deliver? That she didn’t embarrass the ticket. And that’s good enough to be Veep? MSNBC quoted Dianna Boucher, 50, who owns a mobile notary business in Wasilla, Alaska. She said recent media portrayals of Palin have been biased and inaccurate. She said the Sarah Palin on the stage Thursday was the woman she sees at the airport and in grocery stores. And why is the woman who you see at the airport and grocery stores immediately qualified to be vice president? (No matter, she doesn’t know all the details said Joe Lieberman reassuringly. That is apparently her strength.) “On Thursday night, Palin took her inexperience and made a mansion out of it, “ writes David Brooks. Sounds a bit more like a house of cards to me, but no matter. “I was very pleased with Sarah Palin’s performance. I thought Joe Biden was going to eat her alive and then turn her inside out,” said Martha Reed, 50, a Republican who works as an internet media coordinator from Pittsburgh in the same article on MSNBC. Umm, if he had he would have immediately been the bullying man picking on that nice winking lady from Alaska. I think Sarah Palin did women a huge disservice at the debate. Basically it was spun so that any real attack on her qualifications would immediately lead to cries of sexism. When Dan Quayle ran against Lloyd Bentsen he was asked not once but three times about why he thought he was qualified to be vice president. In this debate Biden was constantly warned about not appearing too condescending to her and alienating women. He practiced with Michigan governor Jennifer Granholm to get his body language right. What’s condescending is the notion that somehow we needed to give Palin a break because she’s a folksy hockey mom from Alaska who couldn’t be pressed too hard. This is as close to a job interview as she’s going to have. What’s condescending is saying Biden won the debate (CNN’s insta-poll: Biden, 51 to 36. CBS survey of uncommitted: Biden, 46 to 21. Fox : Biden 61, Palin 39.) and then in the same breath saying Palin didn’t lose (because she didn’t fall flat on her face.) What did she win? Miss Congeniality? She looked like a reasonably well-prepped fairly uninformed ordinary person who’d just won a Reality Show where you get to be President for a day. ( I watched Project Runway right after that. Those contestants were being grilled much more than Palin was. And that was just so they could show their sartorial creations on Bryant Park. ) If Sarah Palin had been a man, do you think she wouldn’t have gotten pummeled for just being vague, refusing to answer questions. Betcha. Brooks is right when he says “The presidency and the vice presidency once was the preserve of white men in suits.” Punditry, which come to think of it is also largely the preserve of white men in suits, seemed to go overboard in awarding her some kind of “Aw shucks, she wasn’t too bad” award. Come to think of it, if Sarah Palin had been a man with the same qualifications would she even be on the ticket? The only good thing was she didn’t try to shamelessly appropriate the women who’d voted for Hillary Clinton. No more reference to the 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling. Then Biden might have had to say “Governor, I know Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton is a friend of mine. Governor, you’re no Hillary Clinton.” On second thoughts if he had, he’d probably have been accused of being sexist. comments |
|


Thanks to the suffragettes, America has women voters and women candidates, and we are a better country for it!
Women have voices and choices! Just like men.
But few people know ALL of the suffering that our suffragettes had to go through to get the vote for women, and what life was REALLY like for women before they did.
Now you can subscribe FREE to an exciting e-mail series that goes behind the scenes in the lives of eight of the world’s most famous women to reveal the shocking and sometimes heartbreaking truth of HOW women won the vote.
Thrilling, dramatic, sequential short story e-mail episodes have readers from all over the world raving about the original historical series, “The Privilege of Voting.”
Discover how two beautiful and powerful suffragettes, two presidential mistresses, First Lady Edith Wilson, First Daughter Alice Roosevelt, author Edith Wharton and dancer Isadora Duncan set the stage for women to FINALLY win the vote.
Read this FREE e-mail series on your coffeebreaks and fall in love with these amazing women!
Subscribe free at
www.CoffeebreakReaders.com/subscribe.html
By Virginia Harris · Posted on Oct 3, 08:02 PMWell said, Sandip. It is especially important to know if Palin is competent since, given McCain’s age and health history, she will almost certainly serve as president for a few days here and there (if she doesn’t take over the rest of his term at some point).
-Editor
http://www.thepoliticalpapers.com By D. R. · Posted on Oct 4, 01:32 AMTHANKS FOR BEING THE IDIOT THAT YOU WHERE SARAH. WE COULD NOT HAVE WON WITHOUT YOU.PLEASE SOME HOW SOME WAY GET ON THE GOP TICKET FOR 2012…WE NEED YOU!!!!
By JAMES DAY · Posted on Nov 17, 12:13 PM