|
YO!
YO! is a collection of short pieces by the writers at Youth Outlook!
Official Participant in the Youth Media Blog-a-Thon From: chicoSol Since the founding of this nation, laws have been passed to discriminate when American leaders felt threatened. There was a time when women were thought to be soul-less; finally, women earned the right to vote. There was a time when slavery was legal, and even when slavery was abolished, the Racial Integrity Act of 1924 made interracial marriage a felony. The act was not overturned until the civil rights landmark case Loving v. Virginia in 1967. This country has come far in the fight for equality; however, we are not finished. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court overturned a law passed in 2000, a ruling that legalized same-sex marriages in California. People unhappy with the ruling brought a new initiative to the election’s forefront: Proposition 8. Prop 8, if passed, would ensure that marriage between same-sex couples will not be “valid” or “recognized” in California. I am 22 and heterosexual, but this issue is pertinent to me because I was raised by a same-sex couple for three years beginning when I was 10. These preteen/early-teen years are considered impressionable, and I’m sure they were. The years that I spent in the care of this couple taught me to welcome diversity and fight for equality. I was healthy. I was happy. I acquired a well-rounded and well-balanced perception of what it was to love everyone and to see everyone for who they are: multi-dimensional, real people with virtues and shortcomings alike. I wouldn’t change this time in my life for anything. Proponents of Prop 8 are using fear tactics. The television ads continue to deceive people, and a number of the claims are false. The ads claim that children will be taught about same-sex marriage in schools. While I do not personally believe it is wrong to teach children about diversity in the family—some children do in fact have two mommies—the fact is that it is untrue. In the state of California, parents and guardians have the legal right to remove their children from any instruction they find conflicting with their personal religious beliefs and moral convictions. The ads also create fear by convincing people they can be sued over their personal beliefs. But California law already prohibits discrimination against race, religion, gender or sexual orientation. Although there are more misleading claims in the Prop 8 ads, I will touch on just one last falsehood: the claim that churches will lose tax-exempt status if they refuse to allow same-sex marriage ceremonies in their religious buildings. The May 15, 2008, California Supreme Court ruling regarding same-sex marriage and the church states: “…no religion will be required to change its religious policies or practices with regard to same-sex couples, and no religious officiant will be required to solemnize a marriage in contravention of his or her religious beliefs. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 4.)” See now, it’s not so threatening, is it? Why do we care so much if people want to marry? Who is really hurt by all of this? The churches? Or gays and lesbians? On Nov. 4, Californians will decide whether to pass a law that legitimizes homophobia. It is our duty to continue the fight for equality. It is our responsibility to put a stop to discrimination. By endorsing this kind of bigotry, we will be sending a message to children with a similar experience to mine—the message that their mommy, daddy, auntie, whomever, is wrong and bad and does not deserve the privileges enjoyed by “better” people. It is time we join the great leaders of equal rights on the platform for equality. Take the stand against discrimination and vote no on Prop 8.Marriage is not a government-issued privilege. Marriage is a human right. comments |
|


One shool went with the SF Governor during school-hours off-campus to a gay wedding. It was in the press. That is not education. Then check ABC News, you will find that Hayward California’s elementary school is now celebrating gay “Coming Out Day”. They also formed a “Gay – Straight Alliance” club for the children. It is true that the California State Board of Education does provide a marriage curriculm. This curriculm has to first be accepted by local school districts before it is used, so they can technically say it isn’t forced. But 96% of them according the Stae of Calif’s Board of Education website has adopted it. That curriculm is now being modified to include gay marriage. I know many gay teachers who have confirmed that they DO teach about marriage and relationships in school. Secondly, it is true that they are teaching tolerance and acceptance of the gay lifestyle and marriage in schools in Mass. and parents are not informed and can not opt out. Some sued over this and the parents lost. There is real court records to confirm this. As far as tax status of non-profits, I don’t think churches are in danger but religous organizations that are not exactly the church are. The Catholic Charities which is the largest agency helping hard-to-place orphans were sued in Mass. because they don’t believe in giving children to gay couples. They lost. They either had to give up their relationship with the government or change their believe and accept gay couples. They chose to shut down their operations in that state. The children are the victims here. No winners.
By Gay Man in OC · Posted on Oct 29, 12:03 AMThe Pro. Prop. 8 people exagerate, so do the NO on Prop. 8 ads. I personally hate politics and half truths. Also California almost got a state holiday, the Harvey Milk, day to honor gays. He was the first famous politician in California who came out! It passed but was vetoed by the Govenor, I think mostly because they were fighting over the budgets. It will most likely come up again and get passed. So those who are not gay and have moral objections have real facts to fear the consequences of gay marriage.
We would have been much better off if this was not done in the courts but instead had our own state constitutional admendment or law. One that would guarantee gay marriage while also guaranteeing that there would be no negative impact on those who have moral issues with being gay. I wish we had done that. I believe we would not see the Prop 8 if we had.
Bottomline, any one who says one side or the other is totally lying is WRONG and ignorant. Also not all gays are “NO on Prop 8.” As a gay man in Orange county, I am voting YES on Prop. 8.
Mischa, get your facts straight before making a fool of yourself.
i think we should have the same rights as str8 people we are americans we pay taxes we own bunesses just like they do so we should have the same rights all men are created eqiuke
By dennis · Posted on Nov 5, 09:44 PM